Saturday, September 25, 2010
Gibbons v. Ogden
steamboat case of 1824. Started because New York wanted to grant to a private concern a monopoly of waterborne commerce between New York and New Jersey. Marshall (vocab word) said that the constitution conferred on Congress alone the control of interstate commerce. Marshall again attacked the states' rights, while upholding the soveriegn powers of the federal government. Interstate streams were cleared of this judicial snag.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
thats it??
ReplyDeleteYes, what do you mean? :) This is from the textbook
ReplyDeletecomes from course-notes too lol. and it juz seems like a lil bit. like not enough info... idk
ReplyDeleteNO this from the BOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! READ THAN CRITICIZE ME !!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeletei know im messin with u lol
ReplyDeleteahhh! i can not wait until you post your words lol:)
ReplyDeletewhat u gonna do criticize me lol
ReplyDelete